Check out this awesome Star Wars clock featuring a starship or fighter on every hour. This $89 handmade clock, features pewter colored vintage classic Action Fleet Micro Machine battleships. The following ships are on the clock (clockwise from 12 o’clock) Star Destroyer, TIE Interceptor, Darth Vader’s Tie Fighter, Jabba’s Barge, Bespin Twin-Pod Cloud Car, Y-Wing Fighter, Super Star Destroyer, Rebel Blockade Runner, TIE Bomber, X-Wing Fighter, Rebel Snowspeeder, A-Wing Starfighter
etsy via geeky gadgets
| |||||
Awesome Star Wars Ships ClockOther cool gadgets from our Archives:7 comments to Awesome Star Wars Ships Clock |    | ||||
|
|||||
AT-AT Boombox Combines Two Great 80's Things
Lego Boba Fett Costume is a Triumph in Brickgineering
Mississippi Clock Tells Time in Mississippi's
Funky Cabochoned Recycled Circuit Board and CD Desk Clock (I didn't know what a cabochon was either!)
Bananaphone! A Bluetooth Headset Shaped Like a Banana
Hang It On Hard Drives are Just Hangin' Out
Rebel Alliance Wrapping Paper Let's You Know If You've Been Nice This Year
Tokyoflash Wasted Watch, Soberingly Cool
[...] [source: craziestgadgets.com] [...]
[...] Lo increíble que podemos ver de los fanáticos de Star Wars es que tienen una maquinaria de merchandising que nunca termina de sorprendernos. Y qué mejor que inagurar este blogcito de inventos frikis que con esta nueva pieza de gallardísimo y estrafalario frikismo: un reloj que en vez de números tiene naves de Star Wars. [...]
You should double-check that description… I’m not exactly a star wars nut but it seems like some of those ship names are off.
Lol, the ships are just spray painted Micro Machines. And yea, the list of ship names is all wrong.
oh look! its half past tie fighter!
The ships are wrong in the description.
12: Star Destroyer
1: Snowspeeder
2: Boba Fett’s Slave I
3: B-Wing
4: TIE Bomber
5: Jabba’s Barge
6: Super Star Destroyer
7: Millenium Falcon
8: Bespin Twin-pod
9: X-Wing
10: A-Wing
11: TIE Fighter
http://craziestgadgets.com/2008/12/29/awesome-star-wars-ships-clock/comment-page-1/#comment-27510